September 17, 2018
Medical Insurance and Healthcare Sharing
Rising Health Insurance Costs and the Rise of Healthcare Sharing
Over the past decade, health insurance premiums have seen significant increases, often reaching double-digit rates. Before the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010, many individuals opted to forgo traditional insurance, facing tax penalties or exploring alternatives like healthcare co-ops or sharing ministries. With the repeal of the ACA’s individual mandate in 2017, more people are considering these alternative models.
Healthcare sharing ministries, often religiously based (typically Christian), operate outside the laws governing traditional insurance companies. These programs provide an alternative to traditional insurance by sharing medical costs within a group of like-minded individuals. The result is often lower costs, but with some coverage restrictions based on religious principles.
How Healthcare Sharing Ministries Work
Healthcare sharing programs are similar to traditional insurance in that they involve monthly payments from members to cover each other’s medical expenses. However, there are key differences: these programs are voluntary and not legally binding, and there is no guarantee of payment for medical expenses. Members may find that, in rare situations, the shared funds from other members may not be enough to cover all costs, and payments could be delayed or require increased contributions.
The most appealing aspect of healthcare sharing programs is often their lower costs. For example, the monthly “share” in these programs typically ranges from $300 to $500, compared to traditional insurance premiums that are often three times higher. Additionally, healthcare sharing ministries tend to have lower out-of-pocket costs, although the amount they cover can vary. These programs also do not have to comply with ACA’s essential health benefits, which allows them to limit certain types of coverage (e.g., birth control, maternity care for single women).
Comparing Healthcare Sharing with Traditional Insurance
While both healthcare sharing ministries and traditional insurance involve paying monthly fees to share medical costs, there are key distinctions. For one, healthcare sharing programs are voluntary, meaning there is no legal contract between the program and its members. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that a sharing program will cover all medical costs, and there may be limits on what they will pay based on the program’s rules.
Additionally, healthcare sharing ministries typically don’t cover routine care like physical exams, and they have unique terms such as “personal responsibility” or an “annual unshared amount,” which function similarly to deductibles in traditional insurance. One limitation of these programs is their exclusion of pre-existing conditions and certain mental health issues, which makes them less suitable for some individuals.
A Personal Account with Samaritan Ministries
Personally, I use Samaritan Ministries, a healthcare sharing program that requires members to adhere to Christian beliefs and regularly attend church. With Samaritan, my family and I share a monthly payment of $495, which covers six people. While the program does have some restrictions—such as excluding birth control or certain treatments—it has been a positive experience for us.
In the event of medical expenses, I submit bills to Samaritan, which reviews them and then assigns a portion to other members to cover. In my case, I had a medical bill of $80,000 from a hospitalization, and Samaritan fully covered it, though the reimbursement process took several months. While some healthcare sharing ministries may have more restrictive coverage, Samaritan has a relatively high coverage limit and offers discounts on bills through partnerships with providers.
Final Thoughts on Healthcare Sharing
Healthcare sharing programs can be an excellent alternative for many people, especially for those who are healthy and do not have pre-existing conditions. However, it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. For individuals with significant medical needs or pre-existing conditions, traditional insurance may still be the best option. Before deciding, it’s essential to carefully review each program’s terms and consult with a professional to ensure you make the right choice for your family’s healthcare needs.
In conclusion, while healthcare sharing has worked well for my family, it’s crucial to understand the limitations and risks associated with these programs before transitioning from traditional insurance.
This website commentary reflects the personal opinions and analyses of Gainplan LLC employees. It does not describe Gainplan LLC’s advisory services or client investment performance. Views in the commentary may change anytime without notice. Nothing here constitutes investment advice, performance data, or recommendations for specific securities, transactions, or strategies. Mentioning a security or its performance is not a buy or sell recommendation. Gainplan LLC uses various investment strategies, not all discussed here. Investing in securities carries risks, including loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Gainplan LLC provides links to third-party websites for convenience. Clicking these links leaves our website. Gainplan LLC is not responsible for errors, omissions, or content on third-party sites and does not necessarily endorse their information. Users accessing these sites must follow their terms and assume all risks.