Back to List

Fannie & Freddie: Is Another Bailout Likely?

 

Fannie and Freddie: Not a Bailout, Just Bad Math

After the housing and banking crisis, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were placed under government conservatorship as part of the federal bailout. To justify the intervention, the institutions were handed over to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), which has managed them ever since.

Recently, there’s been increasing pressure from private shareholders to end this government control. The most common argument? That keeping Fannie and Freddie under federal supervision exposes taxpayers to the risk of another bailout due to undercapitalization. Representative Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) even introduced a bill in March 2016 to suspend federal involvement, citing this exact concern.

Here’s where it gets frustrating: Fannie and Freddie have been sending all of their profits to the federal government. This isn’t a bailout situation—it’s more like forced profit-sharing. Let’s break it down: imagine you’re in financial trouble, and I agree to help—but only if you give me all your net income. In 2015, you send me $20,000. Then in early 2016, I return $5,000 to help you out. That’s not a bailout. That’s me giving you back some of your own money.

To date, the government has collected over $130 billion in profits from these two entities. If there were another housing downturn and Fannie or Freddie needed $100 billion in assistance, the government would still be $30 billion ahead. Yet somehow, Blackburn’s bill portrays this as a dire threat to taxpayers. Coincidentally, her proposal came the day after she received a $5,000 campaign donation from Timothy Pagliara, head of a Fannie/Freddie shareholder group. Her first donation from him since 2009. But I’m sure that’s completely unrelated.

Who’s in Charge? Apparently, Whoever Trump Knows

I debated whether to include this next part since it’s politically charged, but the absurdity was too good to ignore. (Disclaimer: this isn’t about who said it—it’s about what was said.)

The New York Times recently covered Donald Trump’s relationship with Wall Street. According to Trump: “I am friends with all the major banks; they are dying to do business with me.” When questioned about his connections, he said, “Why don’t you call the head of Deutsche Bank? Her name is Rosemary Vrablic. She is the boss.”

Nope.

Rosemary Vrablic is a private wealth manager at Deutsche Bank, not the CEO. In Trump’s defense, Deutsche Bank’s leadership carousel hasn’t made it easy to keep track: Anshu Jain was CEO, then came co-CEOs Jürgen Fitschen and John Cryan, and now it’s just Cryan.

But really, let’s appreciate the confidence it takes to assume that the one person you know at a major institution must be the person running the whole thing. It’s like getting coffee and thinking, “Wow, the CEO of Starbucks sure is down-to-earth.” Also, for the record, the only real boss we recognize is Bruce Springsteen.

Political Theatre, Financial Farce

Whether it’s lawmakers spinning misleading narratives about taxpayer risk or public figures name-dropping private bankers as CEOs, it’s clear that reality often gets lost in the rhetoric. The Fannie/Freddie saga shows how little nuance there is in the bailout conversation, while Trump’s Deutsche Bank comment highlights a disturbing level of detachment from facts.

In both cases, what’s being sold to the public isn’t the truth—it’s convenience wrapped in confidence. And while that might make for entertaining headlines, it’s lousy financial policy.

 

This website commentary reflects the personal opinions and analyses of Gainplan LLC employees. It does not describe Gainplan LLC’s advisory services or client investment performance. Views in the commentary may change anytime without notice. Nothing here constitutes investment advice, performance data, or recommendations for specific securities, transactions, or strategies. Mentioning a security or its performance is not a buy or sell recommendation. Gainplan LLC uses various investment strategies, not all discussed here. Investing in securities carries risks, including loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Gainplan LLC provides links to third-party websites for convenience. Clicking these links leaves our website. Gainplan LLC is not responsible for errors, omissions, or content on third-party sites and does not necessarily endorse their information. Users accessing these sites must follow their terms and assume all risks.

Categories: Industry Ideas, News, The Market

Subscribe to Our Blog